Log in

No account? Create an account
WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!?! - CERisE's Testing for L

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile

April 7th, 2006

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
07:01 pm - WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!?!
This post in the UCSC community got my attention:

Stop military recruitment
SAW will protest military recruitment and the Iraq war on April 11. Protest is at McHenry Library, starting at 9AM.This event comes after April 5, 2005's counter-recruitment action for which SAW was labeled a "credible threat" by the Pentagon and the October 18, 2005 Queer kiss-in. This year SAW approached the Administration with some reasonable suggestions as to how a peaceful protest can occur without disrupting the rest of the career fair. These suggestions have not been adopted by the Administration.

More information at saw dot revolt dot org slash node slash 49 [Intentionally obscured -- Ed.]

This one set me off to begin with because of the "credible threat" bit. People really seem to misunderstand the language there. Now they're wearing as a badge of pride as though they're a threat to the administration. I'm still amazed that they claim that the Pentagon was spying on them.

Well, let's see these "reasonable suggestions", shall we?

These reasonable suggestions included the following: Accommodating a floor plan whereby students can protest the recruiters directly and not affect the rest of the event; Allowing media access to the event; Commitment to not collect student identification, or employ excessive police force, both of which serve to intimidate students interested in peaceful free expression.

Ok, so according to them, it's reasonable to:
1. Single out one particular entity at the job fair
2. Allow non-students in to an event for students
3. Not provide security for an event which has a protest planned for it which in the past has led to protestor initiated violence and property damage.

That sounds _perfectly_ reasonable to me.

SAW regrets that the University Administration has failed to commit to upholding its own stated policy of protecting free speech and free assembly. In doing so, the Administration has lost a real opportunity to de-escalate any potential points of conflict in the coming days.

I think we've read similar bits from bin Laden, haven't we?

SAW has approached the administration for over a month to assure peaceful conditions for peaceful expression, free from excessive force or intimidation. But these efforts have been so far fruitless, as the Administration has adopted stalling tactics and has so far refused to seriously consider any of SAW's suggestions or supply any solutions of its own. On the contrary, there are reports that additional police from an out-of-town police department will be brought in at a great cost (rumored to be over $10,000) to the University.

There actually hasn't been "excessive force" involved at all. Unless, of course, it's excessive to not allow the recruiter's tires to be slashed. It's probably excessive to break up shoving matches between protestors and the recruiters as well.

I find it bitterly amusing that among the heroes of these people are probably Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi -- who never asked for things remotely close to any of the above.

(11 comments | Leave a comment)


[User Picture]
Date:April 8th, 2006 03:58 am (UTC)
It's worth noting that the article's reference to "law schools" appears to actually be a reference to the National Lawyer's Guild, a communist organization with recruiters on campuses. See, for example this post.

The assessment of them as communists came from my perusal, at length, of their website. (They are proudly pro-jihadist as well.) When I reviewed it a year ago or so, they had a proud headline story of the NLG sending a delegation to North Korea to, as they put it, "express solidarity with our Communist brothers."

Like Ted Turner, they didn't see any starvation or brutality -- but it was amusing seeing them dance around (and explain away) the clear political handling and Potemkin village treatment they were given. It was sadly funny.

Hmm. That article is gone -- but there's the testimony from NLG to Congress. In it, North Korea is the victim, and the good guys, and South Korea has the repressive regime.
While there is increased democratization in South Korea, freedom of speech does not exist in the areas of national security, defense or comments related to North Korea. The National Security Act prohibits contact with North Koreans and expressing views consistent with North Korea without government approval. Violators and peace activists we met have spent years in prison for such violations. When I was there this summer a professor was indicted in South Korea for uttering that the Korean war was a war for unification, a view held by the North. The US Congress when it talks about human rights should also call for repeal of the Security Law criminal prohibitions on free association and speech.
They never, um, quite get aronud to mentioning the 250,000 political prisoners in NK, about a quarter of whom die each year from torture, starvation, and overwork. To keep the prison population up, they simply arrest more. But the NLG is unconcerned about their "Communist brothers" in this particular.

I'm sure their Cuba subcommittee and Middle East subcommittee are similar, but I haven't looked at their sites.

The NLG is very active in protest organizing, perhaps second only to A.N.S.W.E.R.

===|==============/ Level Head

> Go to Top